TIME IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT IS – The Day Einstein Destroyed Common Sense

Hello everybody, apologies for the three-day wait for this one, I’ve been away with the family over the weekend, during which I have managed to properly injure my back. Despite the pain though, it’s time for another promised article, the one on Special Relativity, and for this one I’m going to start with a classic.

Imagine you’re sitting on a train moving smoothly through the countryside, and while you’re sitting you happen to pull out a tennis ball, you conveniently have with you, and toss it to a friend sitting opposite you. Everything feels normal, the ball travels over the table exactly as expected, and your friend catches it. Now imagine I am standing beside the tracks watching as you make the same throw as the train passes by me. To you, the ball moved at about 20 mph, however, to me, observing from outside, the ball moved at the train’s speed plus the speed of the throw.

For centuries, this simple idea seemed obvious, and it was the foundation of Isaac Newton’s view of the universe. Then, in 1905, a 26-year-old patent clerk named Albert Einstein published a paper that changed everything. In that paper, he came to a startling conclusion. Space and time are not fixed but actually bend to accommodate one unbreakable rule. And that rule is:

The speed of light is always the same.

You all know this, I’ve written about it plenty of times in my articles now, but at the time, this was revolutionary.

299,792,458 metres per second, which is around about 186,000 miles per second, fast enough to travel around the earth about 7 times in one second, and fast enough to reach the moon in about 1.3 seconds. What makes light particularly special though, is every observer measures it moving at exactly that speed, regardless of their own motion.

I know this sounds impossible but just suppose you are standing still and you are measuring a beam of light from a torch (flashlight to my American readers) and I come racing towards it at 99% of light speed. Common sense tells us that I should measure the light moving only a little faster than me, but I don’t. And neither do you. What we both actually measure is exactly the same speed. Nature is somehow protecting this value, but it’s doing it at a price. Reality itself must change.

The first casualty of this is time. Now then, Newton believed time flowed identically everywhere, however, Einstein discovered that time behaves more like an elastic material. That is, the faster you move, the slower your clock runs compared with someone standing still, and physicists call this time dilation.

Imagine two identical clocks. One of them is safe and sound on Earth, hanging on your kitchen wall while the other is flying through space at enormous speed. If you were to retrieve the travelling clock after its journey it would show that less time has elapsed than the one on your kitchen wall. It has literally experienced less time, not because it has malfunctioned, and not because of some kind of optical illusion. It is showing less time because time itself has passed more slowly for it.

There are tiny particles produced high in the Earth’s atmosphere called muons which without relativity should decay long before reaching the ground, but lots of them survive. Why do they survive? Because they travel near light speed, and their internal clocks run slower. Exactly as Einstein predicted.

On to the next question. If time can stretch, what about space? Well, it turns out space makes sacrifices as well, as an object moving rapidly relative to you becomes shorter in the direction of travel, and physicists call this Length Contraction.

Imagine a spacecraft that is 100 metres long while resting in its space port. After undocking and zooming off to Alpha Centauri, as it approaches light speed, a stationary observer sees it become shorter and shorter, while the crew onboard experience nothing unusual, as from their perspective, it is the rest of the universe that has changed. And this is one of relativity’s strangest lessons. There is no single universal viewpoint as different observers can measure different lengths and times and still all be correct.

Moving on, most people believe they know what “at the same time” means. Einstein showed that they don’t.

Imagine a train, again. There’s a massive thunderstorm raging overhead and bolts of lightning strike both ends simultaneously. To someone standing on the station platform, they would see both flashes arrive at the same moment, so to them the lightning strikes happen simultaneously. However, to someone sitting on the moving train, because it is moving towards one flash and away from the other, the flashes reach them at different times, and to them the strikes were not simultaneous.

So, which person is correct in what they witness? The answer is both of them, because simultaneity itself depends on motion, and this idea was a shock for physicists as it meant that even the ordering of events can depend on your frame of reference.

Ok, let’s move on again. Before Einstein, space was space, time was time, and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri.

Sorry, got a bit keyboard happy there, forget the small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri

Back to space and time, before Einstein, these were always perceived as separate things, but after Einstein, physicists realised they are really aspects of a single entity. That’s right, you’ve guessed it. Spacetime

Every event in the universe has three spatial coordinates and one time coordinate, and together they form a four-dimensional reality called spacetime. You are not merely travelling through space, what you are doing is continuously moving through spacetime. Right now. At this very moment.

This brings us back to the equation that everyone knows, especially if you are a regular reader of my stuff, and are aware of the trouble I had when trying to produce a quick mid-week article on it recently.

E = mc²

Perhaps the most famous equation in history. And to translate it into plain English, without all the complicated maths this time, it basically says that mass and energy are different forms of the same thing. Matter can become energy, and energy can become matter, and the conversion factor is the speed of light squared.

Since light speed is enormous, even tiny amounts of matter contain staggering amounts of energy, and as you regulars know, this principle powers the Sun, nuclear reactors, nuclear weapons, along with many other processes throughout the universe.

While we are on the subject of the speed of light, let’s take a look at it.

Science fiction often treats the speed of light as something that can eventually be exceeded, Special Relativity, however, says otherwise. As an object accelerates its energy increases, the energy required for further acceleration rises dramatically, and near light speed the required energy approaches infinity. Because infinite energy is impossible, a material object of mass can never quite reach the speed of light. Photons can travel at light speed because they have no rest mass (remember my equations the other week?). Everything else though must remain below that cosmic speed limit.

Perhaps the most famous story in relativity is the Twin Paradox. Ready for another analogy? Good, here we go.

Imagine identical twins. One of them stays on Earth, while the other is on our imagined spaceship travelling to Alpha Centauri at near light speed before eventually returning home. When they meet again, the Earth-bound twin is older, while the space-faring twin is younger.

This sounds impossible as shouldn’t each twin see the other moving? The key to this is that the traveller accelerates, turns around and changes reference frames and the Earth twin does not. When all the mathematics is done, the traveller genuinely ages less. Which is why Matthew McConaughey has hardly aged at all when he returns from his interstellar travels and visits his aged daughter. And what is really mind boggling about this is that if fast enough journeys were possible, your future descendants could be older than you after your return!

Moving along once more, many people think relativity is only useful to astronomers, whereas in reality you and I are using it all the time as we drive around to unknown destinations, or have a nosey at our phone to see where the kids are. You’ve guessed it, I’m talking about GPS navigation

GPS satellites carry incredibly precise clocks and those clocks do not tick at exactly the same rate as clocks on Earth so engineers must correct for relativistic effects or navigation errors would rapidly build up. Every time your phone finds a location, a small victory for Einstein is taking place!

So, what did Einstein really teach us?

More than a century later, Special Relativity remains one of the most thoroughly tested ideas in science. Experiments involving high-speed particles, atomic clocks and modern technology continue to confirm its predictions. But at its deepest, the lesson isn’t a mathematical one, it’s a philosophical one.

For thousands of years humans assumed time was universal, space was fixed, and simultaneous events were absolute. Einstein showed us that none of these assumptions are true and the universe is stranger, more elegant and far more astonishing than common sense ever imagined.

Special Relativity’s big reveal is that space and time aren’t the fixed stage we assume they are as they are flexible, they stretch, they bend around each other, and they do it all in service of one stubborn rule. And that rule is the speed of light never changes, no matter who’s watching.

The Holographic Principle – Could the Universe Be Stranger Than We Ever Imagined?

Apologies everyone, I’m a bit late this week. But, as they say, better late than never, and this week, I’m back on black holes again, with an article I promised a while back. So, settle down and start reading. It’s time get to your head round the Holographic Principle.

Imagine walking into a room and discovering that everything inside, the walls, the furniture, even you, could be completely described by information written on the room’s surface. A bit like the programming behind The Matrix.

Now then, this may sound like science fiction, but it is remarkably close to one of the most serious ideas in modern theoretical physics, and that is the holographic principle.

For centuries, we’ve assumed that if you want to describe a three-dimensional object, you need three-dimensional information. You know, a cube has volume, a planet has volume, and the universe has volume. Simple, right?

Then those pesky black holes came along and ruined everything, and physicists discovered that the amount of information a black hole can contain isn’t related to its volume. Instead, it is related to the area of its surface, the event horizon.

That would be like discovering that every book in a library could be stored not inside the library, but on its outer walls. That also meant that something very strange was going on.

Way back in the 1970s, Jacob Bekenstein and Stephen Hawking showed that black holes possess entropy, you know, a measure of information or disorder. The shocking part was that this entropy grows with the horizon’s area rather than the volume enclosed within it. And this tiny mathematical detail opened a huge conceptual door.

If the most information that can fit inside a region of space scales with surface area, perhaps the universe itself isn’t storing information the way we thought. Perhaps reality is keeping its records on the boundary.

And that is where we enter the holographic universe.

In 1993, physicist Gerard ‘t Hooft proposed a radical possibility, and then Leonard Susskind expanded it into what we now call the holographic principle.

Their idea was simply breathtaking! And that idea was everything happening inside a region of space that might be fully encoded on its boundary. Not approximately. Not metaphorically. But quite possibly exactly.

That would make the three-dimensional world we experience akin to the information living on a lower-dimensional surface.

Which leads us to a question. So… Are we living inside a hologram?

Not in the way Hollywood imagines. The holographic principle does not mean that reality is fake, and we are living in an illusory universe as video game characters.

What it actually suggests is that there may be two completely different ways to describe the same reality.

It’s time for one of those analogies I bombarded you with in last week’s article

Think of a globe and a flat map. They look completely different, right? (No flat earth comments please. We don’t do that here). One is curved and one is flat, yet they both describe the same Earth, and the holographic principle proposes something similar on a cosmic scale.

For years the holographic principle was a fascinating speculation until 1997 when Juan Maldacena proposed the AdS/CFT (the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory (yes it will likely take another article)) correspondence, which is now regarded as one of the most important developments in theoretical physics.

The idea can be summarised as: A universe containing gravity can be mathematically equivalent to a universe without gravity living on its boundary. And if it’s true, this means that two radically different descriptions of reality tell the same story. Physicists have spent decades testing this idea, and so far, it has passed many rigorous inspections.

And then the story gets even stranger.  Modern research increasingly suggests that space itself may emerge from quantum information, and one of the biggest clues comes from our old friend quantum entanglement, that mysterious connection that can exist between particles.

Some researchers now suspect that spacetime may be woven together by vast networks of entanglement. In this picture, geometry isn’t fundamental, but information is, and space emerges from it. Which gives us spacetime from information! How freakily cool is that!

Although the holographic principle is powerful, it still remains incomplete. Scientists have convincing examples where it works extraordinarily well, particularly in special theoretical universes described by AdS/CFT. But the challenge is that our actual universe does not obviously resemble those examples. And so, the full holographic description of the cosmos we inhabit remains an open problem.

So the principle stands in an unusual position as it is one of the most influential ideas in theoretical physics, it has impressive mathematical support, it may help solve the black hole information paradox, and yet nobody can confidently say whether our own universe is truly holographic.

And so, the holographic principle began as a puzzle about black holes and grew into a revolutionary possibility that everything we think exists within space may be fully described by information living on a lower-dimensional boundary.

If discoveries in the future were to confirm this idea, historians may look back on it as one of humanity’s greatest insights. It’s not that matter is fundamental, and it is not that energy is fundamental either.

But that, at the deepest level, information itself may be the fabric from which reality is built.

And I shall finish this article by saying…

Woah!!!!!

Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity – The Revolutionary Idea That Changed Our Understanding of Reality

I’ve chosen a biggie this week folks, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. And boy it really is a biggie! It would take volumes and volumes of books to take you through everything, and years and years of research and study for me to write it. So, I’m going to have a go and see if I can put together some kind of short comprehensive guide for you. Ready?

Imagine you’re standing on Earth, feeling gravity pull you toward the ground. For centuries, scientists believed gravity was an invisible force acting across space. Then, in 1915, Albert Einstein popped his two penneth in and proposed something that was truly astonishing. Einstein proposed that gravity isn’t really a force at all, and that instead, massive objects such as planets, stars, and galaxies actually bend the fabric of space and time itself, and what we experience as gravity is actually the result of moving through this curved spacetime.

In a flash, Einstein had overturned centuries of thinking and by doing so he gave humanity a completely new picture of reality.

Before General Relativity, Isaac Newton’s theory of gravity was king, and his equations successfully explained falling apples, planetary orbits, ocean tides, and the motion of the Moon.

However, for everything that Newton’s laws could explain, there were still some puzzles remaining. Newton’s explanation of gravity appeared to act instantly across vast distances, while Einstein’s Special Relativity showed that nothing can travel faster than light. There were also subtle discrepancies in Mercury’s orbit that Newton’s theory couldn’t fully explain, and Einstein believed there had to be a deeper explanation, and there was.

Einstein’s breakthrough began with a simple thought experiment.

Imagine you’re trapped inside a windowless lift (elevator to my American readers).

In one scenario, the lift (elevator) is sitting on Earth, and in another, it’s floating in deep space, but it is accelerating upward. In both cases, you feel pressed against the floor. But, without looking outside, you can’t tell which situation you’re in.

This observation became known as the Equivalence Principle, and that is gravity and acceleration are locally indistinguishable, and for Einstein, this was the clue that unlocked a completely new understanding of gravity.

This is where spacetime comes in, and it is so breathtaking in its simplicity it is mind blowing.

Einstein realised that space and time are not separate things, but instead, they form a single four-dimensional structure which he called spacetime.

Now then, you have to think of spacetime as the stage on which everything in the universe exists and moves. And, to do so, I’m going give you a classic analogy.

Imagine a giant trampoline stretched tight, and as it is stretched tight, it is flat. If you now place a bowling ball in the centre of the trampoline it creates a dip, and if you now roll a tennis ball nearby, its path curves as it rolls.

The tennis ball isn’t being directly pulled by the bowling ball, all it is doing is simply following the shape of the surface, and this is how planets move through spacetime that has been curved by stars and other massive objects.

I know it’s not perfect, but this analogy captures Einstein’s revolutionary insight that it is mass that changes the geometry of the universe.

So, to your first question, I know you have loads. How does gravity really work?

And the answer to this is when most people think about gravity, they imagine an invisible force pulling objects together, however, Einstein saw something completely different.

Here’s another simple analogy (there’s going to be a few of these, so stick with me).

Imagine it’s nighttime and you are driving along a mountain road. Although you keep the steering wheel pretty straight, the road curves left, looking from above, someone might reasonably think that an invisible force has pushed your car sideways when in reality, you’re simply following the shape of the road.

According to General Relativity, planets are doing exactly this, and the Earth isn’t being pulled around the Sun by a mysterious force, it is moving along the curved road of spacetime created by the Sun. The sun is the bowling ball on the trampoline, and the tennis ball is the Earth. Geddit? Of course you do!

Ok, let’s look how that applies to the whole of the cosmos.

At the heart of General Relativity is a set of mathematical relationships called the Einstein Field Equations, and physicists often summarise them this way, and again, it is incredibly brilliant in its simplicity.

Matter and energy tell spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells matter how to move, and these equations connect the contents of the universe to the shape of the universe itself! Cool, huh!

These equations can describe everything from planetary motion to black holes and even the evolution of the cosmos.

And that neatly leads us on to the next question you are bursting to ask.

“If gravity isn’t a force, then why doesn’t the Earth fly away from the Sun?”

And for that answer we have another simple analogy.

Imagine you are throwing a ball. If you throw it gently it lands on the ground nearby to you, however, if you throw it harder, it travels further and if you were to throw it harder and fast enough, the Earth’s surface curves away beneath it as quickly as it falls. The ball keeps falling but never reaches the ground, and that is essentially what an orbit is.

Earth is constantly falling through curved spacetime around the Sun.

One of General Relativity’s strangest predictions is that time does not flow at the same rate everywhere, and near a massive object, time passes more slowly, and the further away, time passes more quickly.

OK, analogy number 3? 4? I’ve lost count already.

Imagine time as a river. Far from massive objects, the river flows quickly, and near a massive object, the current slows. Two people that have been travelling through different parts of the river can reunite and discover that different amounts of time have passed for them.

This isn’t science fiction; this is science fact, as GPS satellites must account for relativistic time effects to provide accurate navigation. To really delve into time, you should read The Order of Time by Carlo Rovelli. This book is a brilliantly understandable read, and you’ll have your head wrapped around time in no time. And it’s got Smurfs in it!

Something else General Relativity told us is that light can bend. Before Einstein, all the science nerds simply assumed that gravity only affected matter. General Relativity predicted that gravity affects light as well.

And to explain it, you guessed it, another analogy.

Imagine you are riding a bicycle along a painted line on the ground, you aren’t intentionally turning. You are simply following the path beneath you. Light behaves similarly. It travels along the straightest possible path through spacetime, and if spacetime itself is curved, the path of light appears bent. Observations of the famous solar eclipse of 1919 confirmed this prediction and also made Einstein world famous.

The bending of light creates one of astronomy’s most powerful tools, and that is gravitational lensing. This is where massive objects can bend light from distant galaxies and act like giant lenses.  If you hold a wine glass in front of a distant light, the image behind it appears stretched, distorted, or sometimes, even duplicated, and galaxies do the same thing to light, and astronomers use these natural lenses to study objects that would otherwise be too distant to see.

General Relativity also predicts objects so dense that spacetime becomes dramatically distorted, and, you’ve guessed it, as these are one of my favourites, it predicted black holes, and with them, their ever brilliantly baffling event horizons, which leads me to my next analogy, the river model of black holes.

Imagine a fish swimming upstream, and way ahead of it is a waterfall. While it is far away from the waterfall the little fishy can easily fight against the current, however, when it gets closer to the waterfall, the water moves faster, until eventually there is a point where the current exceeds the fish’s maximum swimming speed. Beyond that point, escape is impossible, and the little fishy is heading over. A black hole’s event horizon is similar. Beyond it, spacetime is being dragged inward so strongly that not even light can escape. But you know all this, I’ve written about it loads.

General Relativity also predicts that moving massive objects can create disturbances in spacetime itself and these are known as gravitational waves.

Drop a pebble into still water and waves spread outward in all directions. When massive objects such as black holes collide, they create ripples in spacetime that travel across the universe. And those clever scientists detected these waves directly in 2015, thus confirming another of Einstein’s remarkable predictions.

General Relativity has become the foundation of modern cosmology, and it helps explain the Big Bang, the expanding universe, the evolution of galaxies and the large-scale structure of the cosmos itself, and in many ways, modern astronomy is the story of applying Einstein’s theory to increasingly larger scales.

Unfortunately, Einstein’s theory, as brilliant as it is, isn’t perfect. Even though every major experimental test has supported General Relativity for more than a century, physicists know the theory is incomplete as it struggles to explain what happens at the centre of black holes, the earliest moments of the Big Bang, and how gravity works at quantum scales, that pesky teeny tiny stuff again, and finding a theory of quantum gravity remains one of the greatest challenges in science today.

If you remember only one thing about General Relativity, make sure it’s this

For more than 200 years, Isaac Newton’s theory of gravity successfully explained the motions of objects on Earth and the movements of the planets. In Newton’s view, gravity is a force that pulls objects toward one another. The Earth is pulled toward the Sun, the Moon is pulled toward the Earth, and an apple falls because the Earth exerts a gravitational force on it. This picture works remarkably well for most everyday situations and remains extremely useful today.

Einstein’s insight was way more radical.

According to General Relativity, gravity is not fundamentally a force at all. Instead, mass and energy change the geometry of the universe itself by curving spacetime. Planets, stars, galaxies, and even light move through this curved spacetime, following its natural paths. What we perceive as the force of gravity is actually the consequence of moving through a universe whose geometry has been distorted by matter and energy.

A useful way to picture the difference is to imagine a ball rolling across a landscape. Newton would describe the ball’s motion as being caused by forces acting upon it. Einstein would direct your attention to the shape of the landscape itself. If the ground is curved, sloped, or warped, the ball’s path changes naturally as it follows the terrain. In a similar way, planets orbit stars because they are moving through curved spacetime, not because an invisible force is reaching out and pulling them around.

This seemingly simple change in perspective transformed our understanding of the cosmos. From it emerged the prediction of black holes, the discovery of gravitational waves, the realisation that time can flow at different rates in different gravitational environments, and the modern picture of an expanding universe. More than a century after Einstein introduced his theory, it is still one of mankind’s greatest achievements, and it remains humanity’s best description of gravity and one of the most profound (I had to get that word in here somewhere) insights ever achieved in science.

And that my faithful readers, is Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity for you in a nutshell. For anyone who just wanted the 1905 Special Theory, it’s the short, sharp one about speed and simultaneity, no bendy trampolines required. You can pretend the last ten minutes didn’t happen, and, if you’re lucky, and you really want it, Special may get its own piece in a few weeks’ time.

E = mc² – The Tiny Equation That Changed the Universe

Just a quick note before you start reading. This was supposed to be a quick hit for a midweek article, however, it actually took me bloody ages!! Surprisingly, it wasn’t just the maths that caused me issues, it was getting the damned equations into WordPress that made me swear profusely! In hindsight I should have rounded the speed of light to 300,000,000 m/s as most folk would do in an article of this nature. Me? No. I wanted to keep accuracy paramount and use the actual number which is 299,792,458 m/s. Anyway, it’s done now, so on with the article (I really hope you can make sense of it all despite the WordPress formatting).

For this week’s midweek article, just for you, my faithful few, I’m going to answer a question I’ve been sent. And that question is:

“Can you please explain E = mc²?”

And the answer to that question is:

Yes, I can. So, there we go. Question answered. Don’t forget to come back on Friday for this week’s full article on Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

Obviously, I’m joking. I wouldn’t leave you hanging like that. Here’s the actual answer, No, I can’t.

Sorry, still joking, I’m just trying to avoid doing the maths, you all know how much I hate doing maths, after all, I’ve only mentioned it a few times.

Ok, on to the real answer, what actually is E = mc² and what does it tell us?

Well, it may be the most famous equation ever written, yet its message is surprisingly simple, and that is, matter and energy are different forms of the same thing.

So, without further ado, let’s meet the world’s most famous equation. Ready? Of course you are!

In 1905, Albert Einstein published his Special Theory of Relativity, a paper that changed physics forever, and a few months later he published a follow up paper building on it, and in that paper was:

E=mc2E = mc^2

We’ve all heard it, the majority know it’s calculation, but not everybody actually knows what it really means, and that is, this beautiful little equation tells us that every object around us contains an enormous amount of stored energy.

Your phone. Your coffee mug. A sugar cube. The classic physics paperclip. Even you. Everything with mass contains energy.

Right then, let’s break it down.

E=mc2E = mc^2

E = Energy (joules). m = Mass (kilograms). c = Speed of Light

The speed of light is defined exactly as: c = 299,792,458 m/s

But, the equation doesn’t just use c, it uses c².

And that means:

c2=c×cc^2 = c \times c

So, if we substitute the exact value (it’s maths time) we get:

c2=299,792,458×299,792,458c^2 = 299{,}792{,}458 \times 299{,}792{,}458

=89,875,517,873,681,764= 89{,}875{,}517{,}873{,}681{,}764

Or

8.9875517873681764×10168.9875517873681764 \times 10^{16}

That massive number is nearly 90 quadrillion, folks, that is 90,000,000,000,000,000. A seriously big number. And it is this gigantic number that is the reason even a tiny amount of matter contains an astonishingly humungous amount of energy.

To work it out, just imagine a single sugar cube sitting beside a cup of tea, and let’s assume a typical sugar cube has a mass of 4 grams

First let’s convert grams to kilograms by dividing it by 1,000: 4 grams = 0.004kg

Next were going to use Einstein’s equation: E = mc²

Now we are going to substitute the variables with the actual values:

E=(0.004)(89,875,517,873,681,764)E = (0.004)(89{,}875{,}517{,}873{,}681{,}764)

And in joules that calculation gives us:

E=359,502,071,494,727.056E = 359{,}502{,}071{,}494{,}727.056

Or as a simple equation we have

E3.60×1014 JE \approx 3.60 \times 10^{14}\ \text{J}

So, the answer is, one ordinary sugar cube contains 359,502,071,494,727 joules of energy in its mass.

It may not look that remarkable, but Einstein’s equation reveals that our tiny 4-gram sugar cube contains an almost unimaginable amount of hidden energy.

Which leads us straight into your next question.  If a sugar cube really has that much energy stored in it, why doesn’t it explode?

And that is because, fortunately, ordinary matter doesn’t automatically convert itself into energy, and most of the energy remains locked inside the matter. Only special processes can release some of it and they are nuclear fusion inside stars, nuclear fission in reactors, and matter meeting antimatter. It is only in these situations that a tiny amount of mass is converted into energy, and you get a big bang.

A sugar cube does release energy when you eat it, and that energy is chemical energy, and it comes from rearranging atoms. Einstein’s equation is talking about something much deeper, and that is the energy contained in the mass itself. The energy your body gets from eating sugar is only a tiny fraction of the sugar cube’s total mass-energy.

Here’s a fun fact for you, if all the mass of a sugar cube could somehow be converted directly into energy, the result would be vastly greater than the energy released by burning or digesting it, and that is because chemical reactions use only a teeny tiny part of the energy hidden inside matter.

The Sun also runs on Einstein’s equation, as deep inside it, hydrogen nuclei fuse together to form helium, although the helium produced has slightly less mass than the hydrogen that went into making it, which leads to another question. Where did the missing mass go? And you’ve guessed it, Einstein’s equation gives us the answer. The missing mass became energy and this energy eventually leaves the Sun as heat and light.

That’s not all folks, there is an even bigger equation as the famous equation is actually a simplified version of a more complete relationship from Special Relativity, and that equation is:

E2=(mc2)2+(pc)2E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2

E = total energy, m = rest mass, p = momentum, and c = speed of light

This equation works for everything in the universe, whether moving or stationary. Imagine our sugar cube sitting motionless on a saucer, beside a cup of tea. OK, because it isn’t moving:

p=0p = 0

Next, we’ll substitute into the full equation:

E2=(mc2)2+(0)2E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (0)^2

E2=(mc2)2E^2 = (mc^2)^2

And then we’ll take the square root of both sides which gives us…

E=mc2E=mc^2

And there it is, folks, the world’s most famous equation is simply a special case for an object that is not moving.

Ah, but what happen if you pick up the sugar cube and throw it across the room? Quite why you would do that, I don’t know, maybe it upset you or you have saccharophobia, an irrational fear of sugar cubes.

The sugar cube now has momentum, so:

p>0p > 0

Then the full equation becomes:

E2=(mc2)2+(pc)2E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2

Its total energy now includes energy from its mass and energy from its motion, and the faster it moves, the larger the momentum term becomes.

What about Light? I hear you say. Well, light is special because it has zero rest mass.

m=0m = 0

And substituting into the full equation gives us:

E2=(pc)2E^2 = (pc)^2

And taking the square root gives us:

E=pcE=pc

And remarkably, the result tells us that light carries energy even though it has no rest mass. And that means that every Wi-Fi signal, radio broadcast, mobile phone signal, microwave, X-ray, and ray of sunlight carries energy because of this relationship.

Before Einstein, mass and energy were thought to be completely different things, but, after Einstein, physicists realised they are simply different forms of the same physical reality. Matter can become energy. Energy can become matter. The universe constantly converts one into the other. And all of that profound insight can be demonstrated with something as ordinary as a sugar cube. How about that!

So to summarise:

We have the famous equation:

E=mc2E=mc^2

The full equation is:

E2=(mc2)2+(pc)2E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2

The exact speed of light is

c=299,792,458 m/sc = 299{,}792{,}458\ \text{m/s}

And the speed of light squared is:

c2=89,875,517,873,681,764c^2 = 89{,}875{,}517{,}873{,}681{,}764

Which means the mass and energy of our single sugar cube is:

m=0.004kgm=0.004 kg

E=359,502,071,494,727 JE = 359{,}502{,}071{,}494{,}727\ \text{J}

Which tells us that our ordinary cube of sugary sweetness contains an extraordinary amount of energy, and that’s because every kilogram of matter is multiplied by one of the largest important numbers in nature:

89,875,517,873,681,76489,875,517,873,681,764

And that astonishing connection between matter, energy, stars, light, and the universe is captured in just five symbols, which is perhaps the most famous and most powerful equation that has ever been written.

E=mc2E=mc^2

Entropy, Thermodynamics & Black Holes – The Article I Promised You!

Hello again my faithful few, it is time, to discover the hidden rules that govern everything from your morning cup of tea to the edge of the universe. Are you ready? Of course you are!

Did you know, the universe has a favourite direction?

If you place a hot cup of tea on a table and it cools, if you drop an ice cube into a drink and it melts,  and if you spray air freshener into a room and it spreads out, none of these events require any effort, they just happen naturally.

Yet you’ve never seen the reverse occur on its own, have you? Cold tea becoming hot, melted ice spontaneously reforming, or air freshener spray gathering back in to the can.

There’s a reason for this, which lies in one of the deepest principles of nature, and that is, you’ve guessed it, the clue is in the title, it is entropy. A subject I love so much, it gets bolded.

Entropy is the central idea of thermodynamics, the branch of physics that governs energy, heat, and work, along with the direction of physical processes.

And what’s remarkable is, entropy doesn’t just influence everyday events, it plays a crucial role in understanding stars, galaxies, time itself, and even, as I’ve touched on in a previous article or three, black holes.

And now, my faithful readers, I am going to attempt to explain the science of energy without writing a full-blown scientific paper, or a book. Are you ready? Here goes!

Now then. Thermodynamics began during the Industrial Revolution as scientists attempted to build better steam engines, and as is usual when building these types of engineering feats, what they discovered was far more important.

The same laws governing steam engines also govern chemical reactions, batteries, human metabolism, planetary atmospheres, nuclear fusion in stars, black holes, and the evolution of the universe itself.

Thermodynamics became the universal rulebook of energy.

OK. There are four laws of thermodynamics. The first is the Zeroth Law. Now, this law was established by Robert H. Fowler in the 1930s quite some time after the other three laws were established, which is why it isn’t the first law. And it’s a simple one.

If object A is in thermal equilibrium with B, and B is in equilibrium with C, then A and C are in equilibrium with each other. Simples, right? Told you it was. And as simple as this sounds this law allows temperature to be measured. Without it thermometers couldn’t exist.

Then we get the First Law.

The First Law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, energy only changes form, chemical energy becomes motion, motion becomes electricity, electricity becomes light. However, the total amount of energy remains unchanged.

After the first law, unsurprisingly we get the Second Law

The Second Law is the famous one, you often hear about in the movies, or albums by Muse, and is where entropy enters the story.

The Second Law states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases. While entropy may remain constant in an ideal reversible process, it naturally tends to increase, and it is this law that explains why so many processes happen in one direction only.

Next? You’ve guessed it, we have the Third Law.

And that is, as temperature approaches absolute zero, entropy approaches its minimum possible value.

So, that takes us to the first question, what is entropy?

People often hear entropy described as a measure of disorder, and as useful as that description is, it’s incomplete.

There is a deeper meaning, and that is, entropy measures the number of possible microscopic arrangements of a system. Physicists call these arrangements microstates. Which, put simply, means the more possible ways something can exist while appearing the same overall, the higher it’s entropy.

Think of it like a jigsaw puzzle of an idyllic country cottage, surrounded by blue sky with fluffy clouds, a cute picket fence and dozens of flowers growing in the garden. One arrangement produces the completed image, whereas millions of arrangements produce a random mess. Nature overwhelmingly favours the states that are statistically more likely. And that tendency is entropy.

Still with me? Good. Let’s have a look at why ice melts. Ice contains water molecules arranged in an organised crystal structure and when ice melts, those molecules gain freedom. They can occupy vastly more possible arrangements which means the liquid state therefore possesses higher entropy than the solid state. Nature generally moves toward states with more possible configurations.

Next, we have one of physics’ greatest mysteries, the arrow of time, that is, why time only moves forward.

The fundamental equations of physics often work equally well forward or backward, yet reality doesn’t. Glass shatters, eggs break, and people age etc. We never witness these events naturally reversing themselves, and it’s entropy that provides us with the explanation.

As systems evolve, they overwhelmingly move from less probable states to more probable ones, and this increase in entropy creates the direction we perceive as the flow of time.

In the nineteenth century, Ludwig Boltzmann had an incredible insight. He had connected entropy to probability with one famous equation:

𝐒=𝐤ln𝛀\mathbf{S = k \ln \Omega}

Where: S = Entropy, k = Boltzmann’s constant, and  Ω = the number of possible microstates. This equation links the visible world to the invisible world of atoms and molecules, and to many physicists (and amateurs like me), it is considered one of the most beautiful equations ever discovered.

Next, we’ll take a look at why perfect engines can’t exist

Suppose engineers build the ultimate engine, every bit of heat becomes useful work. There’s no waste, and no losses.

Thermodynamics says this is impossible. The Second Law requires that some energy inevitably becomes unavailable for useful work and is released as waste heat, so therefore, no heat engine can ever achieve 100% efficiency. Nature always demands an entropy bill.

Let’s have a look at one of my favourite examples, Black Holes, the very first article I wrote for this blog. Black holes changed everything as for much of the twentieth century, physicists believed black holes were simple objects. They appeared to have, no temperature, no entropy, and no internal complexity, and this, my friends, created an enormous problem.

Imagine throwing a book into a black hole. The book contains information and the information has entropy. If the black hole were to simply swallow everything and hide it forever, entropy would seem to disappear from the universe, and this would  violate the Second Law. That means, somewhere, something was wrong.

In the early 1970s, physicist Jacob Bekenstein had a revolutionary idea and  proposed, what at the time was, a shocking solution. He suggested that black holes themselves possess entropy.

At first, the idea seemed absurd.  How could an object that appears completely black have entropy?

Bekenstein, however, had a realisation, and that was entropy had to be related to the surface area of the black hole’s event horizon. In effect, the horizon was storing information about everything that had fallen inside. And this was one of the most important insights in modern theoretical physics.

Soon afterward, our favourite physicist, Stephen Hawking, made an even more astonishing discovery. Using quantum mechanics, Hawking showed us that black holes are not truly black. They emit tiny amounts of thermal radiation, now known as: Hawking Radiation. Regular readers will  know all about Hawking radiation, I wrote about it a couple of weeks ago, remember?

And this implied something absolutely astonishing. If black holes emit thermal radiation, they possess temperature, entropy, and thermodynamic behaviour. Black holes were no longer just gravitational objects. They were thermodynamic objects. And in some sense, they were giant cosmic heat engines.

Let’s move on to the entropy of a black hole. One of the strangest discoveries in physics is that a black hole’s entropy is proportional not to its volume, but to the area of its event horizon, and this was completely unexpected, as this meant that for ordinary objects, more volume means more storage capacity. Whereas for black holes, more surface area means more entropy. And this relationship became known as the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy Formula, and it suggests that information about a three-dimensional region may somehow be encoded on a two-dimensional surface. This idea later inspired the famous Holographic Principle, one of the most profound concepts in modern theoretical physics, but sorry folks, once again that isn’t for now, that’ll have to be another article (which luckily for you I am working on, so it won’t be long).

What was discovered was black holes are entropy monsters. The entropy contained within a black hole is enormous. In fact, a black hole possesses vastly more entropy than an ordinary star made from the same amount of matter.

When a star collapses into a black hole, entropy increases dramatically, which means black hole formation actually satisfies the Second Law beautifully.

Far from violating entropy, black holes may represent some of the highest-entropy objects in the universe, which is why physicists sometimes describe them as the ultimate entropy engines.

And with that, it was time for another mystery to emerge from the shadows, The Information Paradox.

If Hawking Radiation causes black holes to slowly evaporate, what happens to the information that fell into them? There appears to be three possibilities to answer that question. Either information is destroyed, it escapes somehow, or, more likely, our understanding of physics is incomplete. This became known as the Black Hole Information Paradox, and it remains one of the greatest unsolved problems in physics. Entire fields of theoretical research have grown from attempts to solve it.

Today, many cosmologists believe the universe began in an extraordinarily low-entropy state and that this may govern the fate of the universe. Since then, entropy has steadily increased. Stars burn hydrogen, galaxies evolve, black holes grow, and entropy rises.

Far in the future, black holes may dominate the universe, and even they will eventually evaporate through Hawking Radiation. After unimaginable lengths of time, the cosmos may approach a state of maximum entropy known as Heat Death. This is standard cosmology, and in this state, all the stars are gone, temperature differences completely vanish, any useful work is impossible, and although energy remains, it is hopelessly spread out to be of any use to anything. The universe doesn’t run out of energy, but it does run out of opportunities to use that energy.

So, at the end of the day, thermodynamics began with steam engines, and it ended up explaining reality itself! Which again, as far as I’m concerned, absolutely boggles the mind!

To put it another way, entropy tells us why my favourite Assam tea cools, why stars shine, why time moves forwards, why engines have limits, why life can exist, and why black holes may hold the key to unifying gravity and quantum mechanics.

If the First Law says energy can never be destroyed, then the Second Law says energy becomes increasingly dispersed and increasingly difficult to use.

And nowhere is that truth more dramatic than in a black hole, where gravity, quantum physics, information, and entropy collide at the edge of the known universe.

Entropy is not merely a property of matter. It may be the accounting system for the whole of reality itself!

What Cost The Night Sky? How Three Unrelated News Stories Ruined My Sleep

There’s a particular kind of headache that comes from reading three unrelated news stories in the same week and realising they’re not unrelated at all, and this has been one of those weeks. In truth, this article exists because I couldn’t quite let those stories go, and I’ve broken my own rule of not writing at the weekend because of it. The articles had been rattling around in my head for while, keeping me awake last night, and before I realised what I was doing, this morning, I was deep into research papers, budget tables, news archives and LinkedIn posts, trying to work out whether the numbers being quoted actually added up. The deeper I dug, the stranger the picture became. What follows is the result of several hours of increasingly obsessive fact-checking, prompted in equal measure by frustration at the money governments somehow always find for wars and by the determination of certain tech billionaires to spend vast fortunes attempting to turn themselves into the first Bond villain.

Let’s start with the sky itself, because that’s where this began, with 1.7 million satellites versus the whole of astronomy. The European Southern Observatory has just done something nobody had bothered to do properly before: modelled what happens to astronomy if everything currently proposed for orbit actually gets launched.

The number ESO astronomer Olivier Hainaut arrived at for “acceptable” damage, the point at which satellite interference stays roughly comparable to routine equipment failures is 100,000 faint, naked-eye-invisible satellites.

The number currently on the table, across every proposed constellation from every operator, is over 1.7 million.

That’s not a rounding error. That’s a different universe of consequence, and the specifics are grim: ESO’s Very Large Telescope could lose up to 28% of its field of view to Starlink alone. The Vera Rubin Observatory, arguably the most ambitious survey telescope ever built, stands to lose hours of observing time every single night. And then there’s Reflect Orbital, a company literally planning to put mirrors in orbit to beam sunlight onto Earth after dark, with up to 50,000 of them proposed by 2035. Hainaut’s modelling suggests they could make the night sky itself four times brighter, even from a light-polluted city like Munich.

We are, with a straight face, discussing whether to switch the night sky off. Not metaphorically, actually switch it off!

Here’s where it stops being an abstract problem for astronomers in Chile and starts being a very local one. Meanwhile at home, the same week this ESO analysis landed, the Royal Astronomical Society reported that the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council is withdrawing all funding for e-MERLIN, the network of radio telescopes that includes the Lovell Telescope at Jodrell Bank. Jodrell Bank. The place that tracked Sputnik. The place that’s been quietly doing world-class radio astronomy since before most of us were born. It’s now at genuine risk of closure.

That’s not the whole of it, either. The RAS reported the UK is withdrawing from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope entirely, cutting 20% from the Square Kilometre Array Regional Centre, cutting 20% from the UK’s own contribution to Vera Rubin, yes, the same observatory the satellites threaten to steal hours from, and cutting 40% from the BISON solar monitoring network.

So: the instrument is being switched off from above, and the people who’d use it are being defunded from within, in the same month. If you set out deliberately to sabotage a field of science, it’s hard to imagine a more efficient one-two.

Now for the number that actually made me sit down and do the maths, and look at what we are proposing to spend it on instead, because I’d heard a vague comparison somewhere and wanted to check whether it held up. It doesn’t hold up quite the way I’d remembered. It’s a lot more startling than that.

The US-Israel war on Iran that began in February 2026, Operation Epic Fury, to give it its official name, has, according to the Pentagon’s own figures given to the Senate on 21 July 2026, cost $37.5 billion so far. That’s up from $29 billion in May and $25 billion in April; the number has been climbing by roughly a billion dollars a week. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is now asking Congress for up to $70 billion more in emergency funding, as part of an $87.6 billion supplemental request. If Congress approves that request, the total cost attributable to the conflict could exceed $100 billion.

Here’s the part that stopped me. NASA doesn’t actually cost all that much by federal-government standards. Its annual budget has been remarkably steady at around $24-25 billion a year. The $37.5bn already spent on the Iran war is therefore equivalent to roughly eighteen months of NASA: every mission, every telescope, every ongoing operation, every payroll. Already spent, already gone, no projections involved.

Add the funding now being requested and the comparison grows to roughly four years and four months of the entire US civilian space programme. Say it slowly: four-and-a-bit years of the entire United States space programme, potentially gone in five months of a war that hasn’t produced an observatory, a scientific instrument, or a single piece of usable knowledge about the universe we live in. But hey, that’s OK, it has put the cost of living through the roof.

The arithmetic is straightforward. Add together 2026 and roughly half of 2025 and you reach the equivalent of the $37.5bn already spent on the war. Continue through 2024, 2023 and part of 2022 and the total reaches roughly $107.5bn. Same source data, same calculation, just expressed in time rather than dollars.

I’m not usually one to get on my soapbox, and I do try not to be the “billionaires bad guy,” mostly because it’s boring and it’s usually not that specific a complaint. But specificity is exactly what we have here. We’re not talking about an abstract injustice, we’re talking about a precise, sourced, comparable set of numbers. A dark sky and a functioning radio telescope at Jodrell Bank, for the price of what a war spends in a matter of weeks. Actual, unglamorous, patient scientific research, the kind that doesn’t make anyone rich, doesn’t come with a rocket launch livestream, and doesn’t get you invited on a podcast, going begging for a fraction of a fraction of what gets found overnight for other purposes.

If there’s a genuine, defensible case for where the enormous fortunes of the “let’s conquer space” tech-billionaire set should go, it’s here: into keeping Jodrell Bank’s lights on, not into another few hundred thousand satellites and orbital mirrors marketed as innovation. And if there’s a case for where a nation’s money should go, the maths above makes it for me. NASA gave us the Moon landings, Hubble, and forty years of thinking a bit harder about our place in the universe, and it did all of that on this budget. The full Iran war bill, once the current request lands, could run past four years and four months of that budget. But you don’t even need the bigger number to make the point, eighteen months of NASA, gone in five months of a war that won’t produce a single new fact about a single distant galaxy.

We can afford to look at the stars. We just keep choosing not to.



A quick note on the sources: The comparisons made in this article are drawn from publicly available sources, including ESO’s satellite-impact study, the Royal Astronomical Society’s reporting on UK astronomy funding, Pentagon cost figures reported by Reuters, the BBC and The Guardian, and NASA budget data. The references are included so readers can verify the numbers for themselves and see exactly how the conclusions in this article were reached. Regular readers will know I don’t usually include a source list like this, but because this article grew out of several hours of fact-checking and number-crunching, I thought it was only fair to show my working.

Sources:
ESO, “Beyond the limit”: one million satellites and mirrors in space pose grave threat to the night sky — the original ESO/Olivier Hainaut study
New Atlas, “1.7 million planned satellites to have ‘devastating’ impact on astronomy” — corroborates the 28% VLT field-of-view figure
Royal Astronomical Society, “Mass cuts and potential Jodrell Bank closure ‘devastating’ for astronomy”
Reuters, “War in Iran has cost the US $37.5 billion so far, Pentagon says” (21 July 2026)
Reuters, “US war in Iran has cost $29 billion so far, Pentagon says” (12 May 2026)
The Guardian, “Hegseth tells Senate war on Iran has so far cost $37.5bn” (21 July 2026)
BBC, “Iran war has cost US $37.5bn so far, Hegseth says” (21 July 2026)
Wikipedia, “Budget of NASA” (figures sourced to The Planetary Society’s historical NASA budget dataset)